jducoeur: (Default)
[personal profile] jducoeur

Table of Contents

  • Part 0: Introduction (you're reading it)
  • Lots more to come!

Introduction

I started outlining this series months ago, while I was on sabbatical, but never got around to starting the actual words. I've got a new job now (at OnePass, a refreshingly sensible company providing actually-useful services, which is sadly not the norm at the moment) -- work is extremely busy, but I do need to think about things other than that and politics sometimes, so let's get this going!

All year, I've been mulling the problem of Trust Architectures: how do we share information about "trust" online. As I'll discuss under Use Cases (next time), I think it's getting to be Steam Engine Time to take it seriously. Between the AI Slopocalypse spewing nonsense all over the Web, and the social networks succumbing to Advanced Enshittification, it's getting ever-harder to understand who to trust.

This isn't even remotely a new problem, mind -- it was a pretty old topic when we explored adding this sort of thing to Trenza way back in 2001. But it's rarely been taken really seriously, and most of the better attempts have wound up buried inside proprietary walled gardens that don't necessarily have the human user's best interests at heart.

There appears to be a lot of relatively recent literature on the topic, some of it possibly even good (I'm cautiously intrigued by the OpenRank project). But much of it is obsessively focused on Blockchain, which I'm rather skeptical about (I still consider it to be 90% a solution in search of problems), and most appears to have a lot of assumptions baked in.

So let's step back, and tease this apart. I'm going to intentionally go in a bit naively, so as not to be too biased by everyone else's assumptions, and explore the topic from first principles, winding up with a very high-level sketch of how things might work. Once I have straight what I think are the interesting use cases, requirements, and architectural parameters, we can take a properly critical look at what's already out there.

I expect this to take at least 6-7 installments, likely more like 10 before I'm done -- it's a big, chewy problem with a lot of facets. As I add parts, I'll add them to the Table of Contents at the top of the Dreamwidth version of this post. I'll likely edit some of these posts as we go and folks point out additional nuances; I'll try to be good about crediting folks who point stuff out, so call me on it if you feel like you haven't been acknowledged properly.

This is not fully-baked yet: I'm going to be thinking out loud. That's why this is "towards" -- I'm seeking to make progress here, and we'll see where it winds up. It's possible that we'll find that the One True Trust Architecture already exists, and we should be lobbying for everyone to adopt it. It's also entirely possible that we'll conclude that the problem is insoluble in principle, and give up. (Hopefully not.) The goal is to come to a better shared understanding of the topic, and ideally some actionable ideas about how to deal with the problem.

I hope you'll join in. While I'm going to do a lot of talking over the next couple of months, it's going to be a lot more productive if you chime in with your thoughts and ideas to add to that.

I'm intentionally posting this on Dreamwidth because despite (or maybe because of) its antiquity and old-fashioned UX, it's still the best place for posting and discussing complex, long-form topics, free from the AIs and enshittification consuming most other places.

So I'm planning to post primarily to Dreamwidth, mirror to Medium and LinkedIn since some of the technical crowd mainly knows me there, and link from Mastodon and Bluesky. (But not Facebook, which I've mostly given up on, or Xitter, which I've entirely abandoned.) On platforms that have tagging, I'll be using #TrustArch as the tag for this series.

Comments are welcome at all of those places -- I'm curious to see where I get good conversations -- but the authoritative copy of these posts will be Dreamwidth, and that's the copy that will get edited and updated as this evolves.

That said, a couple of ground rules. I don't want to see comments saying that if it's not 100% perfect, it's not worth trying. (I'm reasonably certain that it's impossible to make this perfect, but I'm moderately confident we could create something helpful.) And I'll be downright scornful of naive claims that we should just leave this for AI to deal with -- while I think it's likely to get quite powerful over the next decade, I'm not at all sanguine that it's going to be trustworthy to that degree any time in the foreseeable future.

But aside from that sort of thing, I'd love to get some serious conversation going. So come along, share your thoughts, and let's tease apart this important problem!

Rosh Hashana at my new synagogue

Sep. 25th, 2025 05:36 pm
cellio: (Default)
[personal profile] cellio

I joined Beth Shalom in August. I'm still time-sharing Shabbat between there and my minyan, though that's winding down. (Sorry, minyan, I love my friends, but I'm settling into my new religious home.) Beth Shalom's Shabbat services are very comfortable and I'm seeing what I've been missing in the Reform movement. So I looked forward to Rosh Hashana this year.

It was great! Also, uh, long, but still a big win. I noticed that a lot of people drifted in over the course of the morning; there were not many people at the beginning and I could get a good seat, it was filling up by the torah service, and filled up more on the way to the sermon and then Musaf. On Rosh Hashana all the "big action" is in Musaf.

In addition to the Unataneh Tokef prayer, Musaf contains the themes of malchuyot (kingship), zichronot (memory), and shofarot (the shofar's call). For each of these three, the machzor (prayerbook) includes relevant passages from torah and prophets, piyutim (liturgical poems), and the sounding of the shofar. I've presumably heard some of those piyutim before, as I did go to Chabad for Rosh Hashana during the pandemic lockdown, but some of them stood out as if new to me this year. One in particular, Melech Elyon (king on high), stood out with some choreography -- this is sung in front of the open ark, except for one verse that talks, in contrast, about earthly kings, where we close the ark (and then open it again for the next verse). Neat, I thought -- as if to say, we will not trouble the king on high with stuff about mere human kings. And maybe that verse also stood out this year because of what is going on with our would-be earthly king, but I'll have to get a copy of the text before I can say more about that. (I do plan to buy both the siddur and machzor used by my new congregation, but haven't yet.)

The Reform services I have attended do basically none of this. The core part of Unataneh Tokef is sung, some other parts are read in English, and I think some of those biblical passages are included in the machzor. I never knew why they were there, and we usually didn't read them. And of course the shofar was sounded, along with the song after each set of blasts, but again, I didn't really grok the structure. And it wasn't in the Musaf service because Reform doesn't do Musaf; it was spread around in other places. I always thought my lack of connection with Temple Sinai's Rosh Hashana service came from an abundance of fluffy alternative English readings where liturgy should be -- and yes, that too, but not only that, I don't think. This year I felt like there was an integrated whole and that I was coming home to something I hadn't realized I was missing.

I knew that Rosh Hashana morning is the longest service of the year, but was still a little surprised by this one. (I expected four hours; it was more like four and a half.) Nonetheless, I appreciate that when we got to the silent repetition of the Musaf Amidah, they allowed us time to really do it. At other times I can't do the silent Amidah (any of them) in the time they leave for it; I'm just not that fast. But for this, we had space. That made a big difference to me.

During the public repetition (which is what takes up most of the time in Rosh Hashana Musaf), there were places where the congregation sang along, so it wasn't just "stand and listen to the leader". And some of those piyutim had lively, uplifting melodies.

I'm looking forward to Yom Kippur. (And Shabbat before then.)

hudebnik: (Default)
[personal profile] hudebnik
Sept. 10: Charlie Kirk was shot to death while speaking on a college campus.
(The same day, several high school students were shot in their school in Colorado.)

Within hours, the FBI announced that it had a suspect in custody, but then released that suspect.

Also within hours, with no suspect in custody, much less any evidence about motives, President Trump addressed the American people:
It's long past time for all Americans and the media to confront the fact that violence and murder are the tragic consequence of demonizing those with whom you disagree, day after day year after year, in the most hateful and despicable way possible. For years those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world's worst mass murderers and criminals. This kind of rhetoric is directly responsible for the terrorism that we're seeing in our country today, and it must stop right now. My administration will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it, as well as those who go after our judges, law enforcement officials, and everyone else who brings order to our country. From the attack on my life in Butler, Pennsylvania last year which killed a husband and father to the attacks on ICE agents to the vicious murder of a health care executive in the streets of New York to the shooting of House majority leader Steve Scalise and three others, radical left political violence has hurt too many innocent people and taken too many lives.


He did not, of course, mention his own history of demonizing those with whom he disagrees, encouraging violence against protesters, describing liberals and Democrats as fascists, criminals, and sub-human animals, attacking judges who rule against him, instigating a riot that attacked law enforcement officials and terrorized members of Congress, and pardoning the rioters. Nor did he mention any liberal or Democratic victims of political violence, such as Paul Pelosi, Jason Shapiro, Melissa and Mark Hortmann, John and Yvette Hoffman, nor the FBI reports stating that a solid majority of political violence in the US is right-wing-inspired.

Sept. 11: Tyler Robinson was taken into custody, after his parents and girlfriend contacted the FBI.

Sept. 12: Mainstream news media (like this in the Times) reported that 22-year-old Tyler Robinson was raised in a solidly Republican family, going hunting in the mountains with his parents, he had a 4.0 average in high school, took several AP and college-level classes, and got a prestigious scholarship to Utah State University, which he left after one semester. He was registered to vote, but not registered to any political party, and had never actually voted. Utah officials said they had found "unfired ammunition that had been engraved with jokes and slang from internet memes as well as the words, “hey fascist! CATCH!”"

Also on Sept. 12, President Trump announced that "we're going to look into Soros", who "should be put in jail ... he's a bad guy" and that George Soros and his son Alex should be charged under RICO “because of their support for Violent Protest, and much more, all throughout the United States of America.”

Sept. 13: More details on cryptic messages Robinson had left, from the Times:
One read, “hey fascist! CATCH! (up arrow symbol, right arrow symbol, and three down arrow symbols),” according to an affidavit filed on Friday in a Utah court.

If the reference to fascism appeared to be straightforward, the arrows were most likely understandable only to certain subsets of gamers. They seem to refer to the popular video game Helldivers 2 and its sequence of controller moves to unleash a powerful bomb.

“It’s a joke in the Helldivers community that you can shut down any argument you disagree with by entering ^ > vvv and blowing the whole thing up,”
...
The messages found on the casings — including puerile jokes and a reference to a popular Italian song — are rooted in that coded communication style of the habitually online.
...
But these messages are difficult to parse. Internet in-jokes and references are slippery things, often deployed with multiple layers of irony. That left many Americans trying to crack the enigmatic messages: Was Mr. Robinson a man of the left or of the right, or something else entirely?
...
“It’s very hard to map a political ideology on this mishmash of video game references and hints of different internet subcultures,” said Emerson Brooking, a fellow at the Atlantic Council, an international-affairs think tank, and a former cyberpolicy adviser at the Defense Department.

One of the messages, “Notices bulges OwO what’s this?,” is often used to mock participants in online role-play communities. Another message said, “If you read This, you are GAY Lmao,” its tone suggesting a kind of sophomoric insult humor common on internet message boards.

Then there was the message that read, “O Bella ciao, Bella ciao, Bella ciao, Ciao, ciao!,” likely a reference to the popular Italian folk song “Bella Ciao.” Popularized as an antifascist anthem in Italy after World War II, it resurfaced globally in recent years because of its inclusion in the hit Netflix series “Money Heist” and in video games, including the first-person shooter game Far Cry 6.

The song is still well-known as antifascist. It was sung as a protest last year by progressive members of the European Parliament during a visit by Viktor Orban, Hungary’s far-right prime minister.

But a number of people noted online on Friday that a version appears on a Spotify playlist meant for Groypers, the followers of Nick Fuentes, the white nationalist who occupies a political space to the right of, and in opposition to, Mr. Kirk.

As people online debated what the references meant, Mr. Brooking mused that the discussion might amount to a mission accomplished for a troll.

“The spectacle,” he said, “has to be the entire point.”


Sept. 15: Attorney General Pam Bondi said, in an ABC News interview,
"Who killed Charlie? Left-wing radicals, and they will be held accountable. So will anyone in this country who commits a violent crime against anyone. And the death penalty, thanks to Donald Trump, is on the table again."

The attorney general, however, did not offer a motive as to why the alleged suspect, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, killed Kirk last Wednesday while he was speaking at an event on a university campus in Utah.

Pressed on whether Robinson acted alone, she said it is an ongoing investigation.


As of Sept. 15, there was no clear evidence about the alleged assassin's motives, just a mishmash of tidbits that could be read as left-wing, right-wing, or just plain attention-seeking, depending largely on your priors. If you were politically left-wing, you saw him as a Republican gun-lover with a video-game habit; if you were politically right-wing, you saw him as a "left-wing radical", pro-trans and anti-fascist. There was also no evidence whatsoever of him conspiring with or being supported by anyone else, despite Bondi's consistent use of the plural.

Later on Sept. 15, Jimmy Kimmel said, in his opening monologue,
We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it, and in between the finger-pointing, there was grieving...

Not one word critical of Charlie Kirk, only the assertion that his murderer was "one of" the MAGA gang, which contradicted Trump-and-Bondi's story that Kirk was killed by a vast "radical left" conspiracy.

Sept. 17: FCC Chair Brendan Carr described Kimmel's statement in an interview as "the sickest conduct possible" and added
I think that it's really sort of past time that a lot of these licensed broadcasters themselves push back on Comcast and Disney and say 'listen, we are going to preempt -- we are not going to run Kimmel any more until you straighten this out' ... I mean look, we can do this the easy way or the hard way.


Stephen Colbert juxtaposes this with quotes from Brendan Carr in 2020:
From Internet memes to late-night comedians ... Political Satire ... helps hold those in power accountable... Shutting down this type of political speech -- especially at the urging of those targeted or threatened by its message -- would represent a serious threat to our freedoms.


Within hours, Nexstar and Sinclair, two companies that each own dozens of ABC affiliate stations and are both seeking FCC approval for mergers and acquisitions, obediently announced that they would refuse to run Jimmy Kimmel's show.

Carr responded on X:
I want to thank Nexstar for doing the right thing.

Local broadcasters have an obligation to serve the public interest. While this may be an unprecedented decision, it is important for broadcasters to push back on Disney programming that they determine falls short of community values.

I hope that other broadcasters follow Nexstar’s lead.


A few hours later, Disney/ABC (which is also seeking FCC approval for a sale) announced that it would cancel Jimmy Kimmel's show "indefinitely".

[Stephen Colbert points out that when his show was cancelled two months ago, while his employer was seeking FCC approval for a merger, Trump had celebrated and added "Kimmel is NEXT to go"]

Sept. 18: President Trump said "Jimmy Kimmel was fired because he had bad ratings more than anything else and he said a horrible thing about a great gentleman known as Charlie Kirk." He did not identify what "horrible thing" Kimmel had said.

Later on the 18th, he posted on Truth Social
Great News for America: The ratings challenged Jimmy Kimmel Show is CANCELLED. Congratulations to ABC for finally having the courage to do what had to be done. Kimmel has ZERO talent, and worse ratings than even Colbert, if that’s possible. That leaves Jimmy and Seth, two total losers, on Fake News NBC. Their ratings are also horrible. Do it NBC!!! President DJT

So I did a thing...

Sep. 18th, 2025 09:59 pm
hudebnik: (Default)
[personal profile] hudebnik
Roughly the same Thing as in this post: a 5km run/walk along the banks of the Hudson River, sponsored by My Benevolent Employer. I apparently finished in 31:58 minutes, one second faster than last year, or 10:17 minutes per mile, 73rd percentile for time among all the runners (which isn't bad, since I was probably 95th percentile by age). I was drenched in sweat, and fairly wiped out physically for a couple of hours thereafter.

Returned to the office, changed my shirt, and had some grapes (carbs AND water! Two great tastes that taste great together!), sat in air conditioning for a while, then went home, took a shower, and changed everything else. Feeling better now.

Watergate and comedy

Sep. 18th, 2025 10:10 am
fabrisse: (Default)
[personal profile] fabrisse
Gather 'round, children. As an elder of the tribe, I must remind you of history, and the perspectives it can provide.

https://www.gocomics.com/doonesbury/1973/05/29

The above link goes to what is probably the most famous Doonesbury cartoon of all time. Many papers refused to run it. Many that did run it, put it on the editorial page rather than the comics page. The Washington Post ran an editorial about why it didn't run it. It was controversial because it violated the presumption of innocence for John Mitchell. Many papers cancelled Doonesbury, though most who didn't run it, just skipped that day.

And that was it. It was well known that President Nixon hated Doonesbury and, by extension, Garry Trudeau, but he didn't demand any retribution.

Watergate was a punchline. It was a punchline for Flip Wilson who ran at 8 p.m. on Thursdays. It was a punchline for local radio DJs. It was a punchline for Johnny Carson (who was scathing in some of his monologues). And no one got cancelled, suspended, or disappeared for the jokes, whether good or bad.

When Gerald Ford came into office in late 1974, he said [perhaps slightly paraphrased], "In Washington, we get our news from intelligence briefings, The Washington Post, and Doonesbury -- not necessarily in that order."

It never occurred to me that I would look back on the violent and discordant early 1970s as "the halcyon days." Still, say what you will against Richard Nixon, he believed in the Constitution and he understood all the amendments.

Responding to violence

Sep. 18th, 2025 06:52 am
hudebnik: (Default)
[personal profile] hudebnik
There are a lot of high-profile acts of violence in this country. Political assassinations (or attempts at same), mass shootings in schools, mass shootings in grocery stores, mass shootings in churches, mass shootings in night clubs, etc. How do we respond when they happen?

Whenever there's a high-profile act of violence, anywhere in the US, prominent Democrats have a simple, standard response: "this shouldn't have happened, this didn't need to happen, this doesn't happen nearly as often in any other developed nation, what can we do to prevent this happening again?"

Prominent Republicans have a more complex response, depending mostly on the victim(s). If the victims were innocent children, the answer is "We send our thoughts and prayers to the friends and families. Now is a time for unity and mourning; it's too soon to politicize it." If the victims were associated with the political right, the answer is to politicize it within hours, before anything is known about the perp's motives: "The radical left did this; we have to take revenge against the left." If the victims were associated with the political left, the answer is either to blame the victims (e.g. the Kyle Rittenhouse shootings), make fun of the victims (e.g. Paul Pelosi), or forget the episode ever happened (e.g. the shootings of Melissa and Mark Hortmann, John and Yvette Hoffman in their homes, the arson attempt on Josh Shapiro's home, the kidnapping attempt on Gretchen Whitmer).

Government censorship

Sep. 17th, 2025 09:25 pm
cvirtue: CV in front of museum (Default)
[personal profile] cvirtue

Comedian says a thing. FCC Commissioner threatens to pull broadcast license of network if it doesn't fire comedian. How is this not PRECISELY government censorship?

This is what got him cancelled – not ill of the dead, but speculation about MAGA motives. “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” Kimmel said in his monologue.

It's been awhile

Sep. 17th, 2025 04:11 pm
fabrisse: (Default)
[personal profile] fabrisse
At the end of August, Sis and I drove my car to Atlanta which means it now has about 1100 miles on it. Our main objective was the Georgia Aquarium. It was lovely, and I got to meet a Beluga whale named Kina.

Our secondary objective was to talk to Passport Health about what vaccinations we needed for our trip to South America in December.

Chikungunya was a disease I'd never heard of before. It's mosquito borne, so although we are going to be on a ship most of the time, we opted for it. For the same reason, we wanted the Yellow Fever vaccine, but it's not great for people over 60. We left it as one to discuss with our primary care physicians. Whee. Since it's mosquito borne, I'd like to get it, but the potential side effects are sufficiently scary to make it worth the discussion.

We got TDaP boosters. I was also thrilled to find out that the Typhoid Fever vaccine comes as an oral medication which has to be taken for four days. Since it didn't leave me with a red circle around a dot that has its own fever and hurts like hell, I definitely approve of it. Last but not least, we had the first of two shots for Hepatitis A.

The reactions were minor.

We also got some heavy-duty bug spray for our clothes. Supposedly, it lasts up to 7 washes. And we made sure we had recommendations for medications to take with us.

I'm scheduled for COVID-19 and Flu shots next week. I'm under the age for the COVID shot, but my severe asthma should get me the all important doctor's note to let me take it. I see the pulmonologist's NP on Monday. Fingers crossed. We're also crossing fingers that Sis can use my asthma to get her COVID shot.

In honor of the current irrationality surrounding vaccination, I'd like to share a video:



The best thing in my life right now is submitting my fandoms for Yuletide.
Page generated Sep. 29th, 2025 12:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios